STAGE-CONTINGENT FUNDAMENTALS OF STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATION: EVIDENCE FROM UNIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS

Authors

  • Azat Aituar M. Narikbayev KAZGUU University
  • Omar Bolatbay M. Narikbayev KAZGUU University
  • Vilem Semerak Ph.D., Researcher at the Economics Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, vilem.semerak@cerge-ei.cz, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8678-0516
  • Ashish Adhikari Research Assistant/Data Analyst, University of Houston, ashish.adhikari29@outlook.com, ORCID ID: 0009-0004-6349-6362
  • Arna Suleimen M. Narikbayev KAZGUU University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52123/1994-2370-2025-1540

Keywords:

structural transformation, stage of development, industrialization, diversification, complexity, innovation, univariate logistic regression

Abstract

This paper explores the fundamental factors influencing movement across five developmental stages within a global country classification as proposed by Aituar et al. We operationalize the staged frameworks of Rostow, Ohno, and Porter by estimating stage-specific univariate logistic regressions for each transition, utilizing a comprehensive set of institutional, policy, and capability variables while reporting odds ratios and ranking the leading predictors for each transition. In this framework of structural transformation, economies advance along a path of manufacturing led development, progressing from pre-industrial conditions to early manufacturing, followed by diversification through enhanced domestic linkages and integration into global value chains, increased complexity, and ultimately reaching an innovation frontier. Our findings support and refine this narrative: the take-off stage is most closely linked to investment capacity and basic appropriability; diversification is associated with administrative and legal predictability as well as external-risk management; maturity correlates with significant investment and appropriability effects alongside regulatory alignment and advanced factor conditions; and entry into the frontier and sustained presence there is tied to robust rule-of-law institutions and disciplined openness. Indicators tend to strengthen systematically across stages. Two refinements emerge from our analysis: appropriability (proxied by intellectual property as % of GDP) plays a more significant role earlier than the literature suggests, and the positive associations observed between inflation volatility (proxied by standard deviation of inflation) reflects temporary reform turbulence rather than causal growth and stage advancement.

References

REFERENCES

Aituar, A. N., Bolatbay, O. B., & Abdukadyrov, N. T. (in press). Forks in the road: Globalization, deindustrialization, and economic growth pathways. Economies.

Acemoglu, D., Gallego, F. A., & Robinson, J. A. (2014). Institutions, human capital, and development. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 875–912. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041119

Rostow, W. W. (1971). The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ohno, K. (2013). Learning to Industrialize: From Given Growth to Policy-aided Value Creation. London: Routledge.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.

Rodrik, D. (2013). Structural Change, Fundamentals, and Growth: An Overview. Institute for Advanced Study.

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401.

Chenery, H. B., & Syrquin, M. (1975). Patterns of Development, 1950–1970. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Szirmai, A. (2012). Industrialisation as an Engine of Growth in Developing Countries, 1950–2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4), 406–420.

Haraguchi, N., Cheng, C. F. C., & Smeets, E. (2017). The Importance of Manufacturing in Economic Development: Has This Changed? World Development, 93, 293–315.

Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature Deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(1), 1–33.

Limão, N., & Venables, A. J. (2001). Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs, and Trade. World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 451–479.

Wacziarg, R., & Welch, K. H. (2008). Trade Liberalization and Growth: New Evidence. World Bank Economic Review, 22(2), 187–231.

Branstetter, L. G., Fisman, R., & Foley, C. F. (2006). Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Evidence from U.S. Firm-Level Panel Data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 321–349.

Mehlum, H., Moene, K., & Torvik, R. (2006). Institutions and the Resource Curse. Economic Journal, 116(508), 1–20.

Imbs, J., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Stages of Diversification. American Economic Review, 93(1), 63–86.

Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. (2011). The Network Structure of Economic Output. Journal of Economic Growth, 16(4), 309–342.

Lederman, D., & Maloney, W. (2003). Trade Structure and Growth. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. (Policy Research Working Paper 3025).

Gylfason, T. (2001). Natural Resources, Education, and Economic Development. European Economic Review, 45(4–6), 847–859.

Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2007). What You Export Matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 1–25.

Balland, P.-A., Boschma, R., & Rigby, D. (2022). The new paradigm of economic complexity. Research Policy, 51(3), 1–12.

Antonietti, R., Ferrante, F., & Patrizio, R. (2021). From FDI to economic complexity: A panel Granger causality analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 57, 21–36.

Şanlı, D. (2024). Do Economic Complexity Drivers Differ by Income Level? SAGE Open, 14(1), 1–17.

Takpara, M. M. (2024). Effect of Trade Facilitation on Economic Complexity in Selected African Countries. African Development Review, 36(2), 165–180.

Eichengreen, B., Park, D., & Shin, K. (2013). Growth Slowdowns Redux: New Evidence on the Middle-Income Trap. NBER Working Paper 18673.

Aiyar, S., Duval, R., Puy, D., Wu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2013). Growth Slowdowns and the Middle-Income Trap. IMF Working Paper 13/71.

Felipe, J., Abdon, A., & Kumar, U. (2012). Tracking the Middle-Income Trap: What Is It, Who Is in It, and Why? Asian Development Bank, Working Papers 306/307.

Lee, K. (2013). Schumpeterian Analysis of Economic Catch-up: Knowledge, Path-creation, and the Middle-income Trap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

Acemoglu, D. (2025, February 6). Institutions, technology, and prosperity: A framework for comparative development (Working paper). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Additional Files

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Aituar, A., Bolatbay, O., Semerak, V., Adhikari, A., & Suleimen, A. (2025). STAGE-CONTINGENT FUNDAMENTALS OF STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATION: EVIDENCE FROM UNIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS. Public Administration and Civil Service, 4(95), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.52123/1994-2370-2025-1540

Similar Articles

<< < 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.