ENERGY DIPLOMACY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE GLOBAL ENERGY TRANSITION

Authors

  • Assem Sadykova Академия государственного управления
  • Kamilla Sheyazdanova Academy of public administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Oleg Barnashov Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52123/1994-2370-2025-1556

Keywords:

energy diplomacy, energy security, energy transition, neorealism, renewable energy, Kazakhstan, climate resilience

Abstract

Contemporary transformations of the global energy system, accompanied by intensifying geopolitical tensions and climate-related challenges, determine the relevance of studying energy diplomacy as a key instrument of security and sustainable development. The purpose of this article is to trace the evolution of energy diplomacy from its traditional focus on resource security to the integration of ecological, technological, and social dimensions into international strategies. The central hypothesis assumes that the neorealist perspective provides the strongest explanatory framework for analyzing current dynamics, since competition for resources and control over transit routes remain primary determinants of world politics, while liberal and constructivist interpretations demonstrate limited explanatory capacity. Methodologically, the study relies on an interdisciplinary synthesis of political economy, international relations theory, comparative analysis, and a critical review of academic literature, including the Kazakhstani research segment, which emphasizes hydrogen energy, risk management, and regional imbalances. The findings indicate a gradual shift of energy diplomacy from fragmented practices toward more comprehensive and coordinated international approaches aimed at promoting renewable energy and energy efficiency. The conclusion highlights the necessity of multi-level and multi-actor governance that combines geopolitical security with climate resilience and energy justice, thereby reinforcing the applied significance of the study for both national policy-making and global energy strategies.

Author Biographies

Kamilla Sheyazdanova , Academy of public administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan

PhD, Associate Professor at the Institute of Diplomacy of the Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan

Oleg Barnashov, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow,

PhD, Head of the Office for Cooperation with International Organizations, Department of International Cooperation in Science and Education, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow,

References

1. Bang, G. (2021). The United States: conditions for accelerating decarbonisation in a politically divided country. International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics, 21(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09530-x

2. Capturing the Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency. (2014). In OECD eBooks. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264220720-en

3. Castillo-Reyes, O., Hu, X., Wang, B., Wang, Y., &Guo, Z. (2023). Electromagnetic imaging and deep learning for transition to renewable energies: a technology review [Review of Electromagnetic imaging and deep learning for transition to renewable energies: a technology review]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 11. Frontiers Media. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1159910

4. Cheng, J., Tong, D., Zhao, H., Xu, R., Qin, Y., Zhang, Q., Bhuwalka, K., Caldeira, K., & Davis, S. J. (2025). Trade risks to energy security in net-zero emissions energy scenarios. Nature Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02305-1

5. Hornborg, A. (2019). Colonialism in the Anthropocene: the political ecology of the money-energy-technology complex. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2019.01.01

6. Hu, G., Yang, J., & Li, J. (2022). The Dynamic Evolution of Global Energy Security and Geopolitical Games: 1995~2019. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14584. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114584

7. Ibrayeva, A., Koshanova, S., Irsaliyev, S., Nurdavletova, S., &Kukeyeva, F. (2024). The role of hydrogen in ensuring Kazakhstan’s energy security. PolitykaEnergetyczna – Energy Policy Journal, 27(4), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.33223/epj/195623

8. Jiang, W., &Martek, I. (2021). Political risk analysis of foreign direct investment into the energy sector of developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 302, 127023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127023

9. Johannsen, R. M., Østergaard, P. A., Maya-Drysdale, D. W., &Mouritsen, L. K. E. (2021). Designing Tools for Energy System Scenario Making in Municipal Energy Planning. Energies, 14(5), 1442. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14051442

10. Judson, E., Fitch-Roy, O., &Soutar, I. (2022). Energy democracy: A digital future? Energy Research & Social Science, 91, 102732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102732

11. Kaya, Y., & Kaya, H. D. (2025). Global Energy Policy: A Legal Perspective on Renewable Energy Initiatives. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202503.2172.v1

12. Knox‐Hayes, J., Brown, M. A., Sovacool, B. K., & Wang, Y. (2013). Understanding attitudes toward energy security: Results of a cross-national survey. Global Environmental Change, 23(3), 609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.003

13. Laes, E., Gorissen, L., &Nevens, F. (2014). A Comparison of Energy Transition Governance in Germany, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Sustainability, 6(3), 1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6031129

14. Legrand, T., & Stone, D. (2018). Science diplomacy and transnational governance impact. British Politics, 13(3), 392. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-018-0082-z

15. Levenda, A., Behrsin, I., &Disano, F. (2020). Renewable energy for whom? A global systematic review of the environmental justice implications of renewable energy technologies. Energy Research & Social Science, 71, 101837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101837

16. Murdock, H. E., Adib, R., Lins, C., Guerra, F., Misra, A., Vickery, L., Collier, U., Feuvre, P. L., Bianco, E., Mueller, S., Philibert, C., Schmidt, O., Kvarnstroem, O., Hungerford, Z., Frankl, P., Hawila, D., Ferroukhi, R., Renner, M., Nagpal, D., … Rooijen, S. V. (2018). Renewable Energy Policies in a Time of Transition. https://apo.org.au/node/216701

17. Nurgaliuly, A., &Smagulova, S. (2025). Economic assessment of energy security of the regions of Kazakhstan. Economics – Innovative and Economics Research Journal, 13(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2025-0038

18. Omirtay, A., &Elemesov, R. (2020). Energy security administration of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Journal of Economic Research & Business Administration, 131(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.26577/be.2020.v131.i1.01

19. Ongdash, A., Omirtay, A., &Nurgabylov, M. (2023). Participation of Kazakhstan in the world energy market: Problems and development prospects. ECONOMIC Series of the Bulletin of the L. N. Gumilyov ENU, (2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.32523/2789-4320-2023-2-63-76

20. Pereira, S., Silva, C., & Ferreira, L. M. D. F. (2025). Barriers to energy transition: Comparing developing with developed countries. Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for Sustainable Development, 87, 101753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2025.101753

21. Popp, L., &Kudaibergenov, T. (2025). Risk management strategies in Kazakhstan’s fuel and energy complex. ECONOMIC Series of the Bulletin of the L. N. Gumilyov ENU, (2), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.32523/2789-4320-2025-2-9-25

22. Radtke, J., &Renn, O. (2024). Participation in Energy Transitions: A Comparison of Policy Styles. Energy Research & Social Science, 118, 103743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103743

23. Settino, J., Ferraro, V., &Morrone, P. (2023). Energy analysis of novel hybrid solar and natural gas combined cycle plants. Applied Thermal Engineering, 230, 120673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120673

24. Yu, Y., Xia, S., Huang, P., & Qian, J. (2024). Energy transition: Connotations, mechanisms and effects. Energy Strategy Reviews, 52, 101320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101320

25. Аубакирова, Г. М., Бирюков, В. В., Исатаева, Ф. М., &Мажитова, С. К. (2023). Декарбонизация экономики Казахстана: перспективы энергетического перехода. Economy: StrategyandPractice, 18(4), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.51176/1997-9967-2023-4-55-72

26. Нұрғалиұлы, А., Бекетова, К. Н., &Смагулова, Ш. А. (2024). Сравнительный анализ библиометрических данных по энергетической безопасности. CentralAsianEconomicReview, (3), 132–154. https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2024-3-132-154

27. Сарсембаев, М. (2022). Водородная энергетика, особенности водородно-транспортного машиностроения: казахстанское и международное право. Евразийскийжурналмеждународногоправа, 4(4), 10–31. https://doi.org/10.32523/2791-0954-2022-4-4-10-31

Additional Files

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Sadykova, A., Sheyazdanova , K., & Barnashov, O. (2025). ENERGY DIPLOMACY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE GLOBAL ENERGY TRANSITION. Public Administration and Civil Service, 4(95), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.52123/1994-2370-2025-1556

Similar Articles

<< < 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.