DIGITAL DIPLOMACY: HOW THE EU UTILIZES FACEBOOK IN CENTRAL ASIA

Authors

  • Manuel Fernandez-Grela Professor at the University of Santiago de Compostela, a researcher at the IDEGA
  • Maltabarov Arsen Lecturer of the Department of International Relations and World Economy, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8864-6049
  • Apsattarova Gulzada Senior Lecturer of the Department of International Relations and World Economy, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52123.1994-2370-2025-1361

Keywords:

Digital diplomacy, social media, region, European Union, Central Asia, digital transformation

Abstract

This article analyzes the diplomatic presence of European Union countries on social media platforms within Central Asian countries. The issue under consideration is the need to evaluate the effectiveness of social media as a diplomatic tool for EU missions in Central Asia. The research methodology includes the analysis of Facebook data and diplomatic profiles from 2009 to 2024. The study employs engagement metrics such as the number of followers, likes, shares, and comments. Through these metrics, the authors sought to assess the effectiveness of the digital diplomatic efforts undertaken by diplomats. In addition, a correlation analysis is conducted to determine the relationship between the frequency of posts and audience engagement. The results show significant differences in the use of social media by various EU countries. This highlights the role of cultural and regional factors in shaping diplomatic strategies. The practical significance of this research lies in providing recommendations for diplomats to optimize their social media strategies. These strategies should align with cultural expectations as well as the preferences of target audiences.

Downloads


Abstract views: 87 |

Published

2025-03-31

How to Cite

Fernandez-Grela, M., Maltabarov А., & Apsattarova, G. (2025). DIGITAL DIPLOMACY: HOW THE EU UTILIZES FACEBOOK IN CENTRAL ASIA. Public Administration and Civil Service, 1(92), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.52123.1994-2370-2025-1361