A MODEL FOR ACCELERATING PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN’S PUBLIC SECTOR: ADAPTING THE UAE 100-DAYS CHALLENGE
Keywords:
project management, public administration, innovation, government accelerators, digital maturityAbstract
Amid rising technological and institutional complexity, public administration increasingly confronts the limitations of traditional bureaucratic mechanisms for project delivery. Lengthy approval cycles, fragmented accountability, and weak interagency coordination reduce the state’s capacity to respond promptly to socio-economic challenges and implement innovative solutions. In this context, accelerated models of managing government initiatives—focused on achieving measurable outcomes within compressed timeframes—are of growing scholarly and practical interest. This study substantiates the feasibility and conditions for adapting the government acceleration model “100 Days Challenge,” implemented in the United Arab Emirates, to the public administration system of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The methodological basis comprises qualitative case analysis, comparative examination of international government accelerator practices, and analysis of the pilot application of the 100-day methodology in Kazakhstan in 2024. The article demonstrates that acceleration mechanisms can substantially shorten the implementation time of cross-agency projects, increase controllability and transparency, and create conditions for institutional learning in the public sector. It is argued that direct transplantation of the UAE model into Kazakhstan is not feasible due to differences in project management maturity and institutional environment. As a scientific contribution, the paper proposes an adaptation framework—Kazakh 100-Day Challenge (K-100)—that combines a centralized political mandate, temporary autonomous acceleration structures, and formalized transparency and documentation protocols. The findings expand understanding of governance innovation transfer mechanisms in transitional administrative systems and may inform the design of national tools for accelerating public reforms.
: 89
: 37
References
1. Battalov, N., & Kangalakova, D. (2023). The adoption of project management practices by a local government in Kazakhstan: Barriers and solutions. Public Policy and Administration, 22(4), 548–564. https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-23-22-4-12
2. Deltek. (n.d.). Government procurement models. https://www.deltek.com/en/government-contracting/guide/government-procurement/models
3. Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00121
4. Global CIO. (2025). Key IT trends in Kazakhstan 2025. https://globalcio.com/longread/Digital-Strategies-of-Kazakhstan/
5. Government of the United Arab Emirates. (2017). UAE Centennial 2071. UAE Government Portal.
6. Government of the United Arab Emirates. (2024). Government Accelerators. UAE Government Portal. https://u.ae/en/about-the-uae/uae-competitiveness/steps-to-enhance-government-performance/government-accelerators
7. Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2022). Policy cycles and subsystems: Theories of the policy process (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
8. Libman, A. (2008). Economic role of public administration in Central Asia: Decentralization and hybrid political regime. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper No. 10940. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10940/
9. OECD. (2019). Diffusing lessons: Lifecycle report. OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation (OPSI). https://oecd-opsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Diffusing_Lessons_LifecycleReport6_FINAL.pdf
10. OECD. (2025). Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2025: Technology convergence. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/10/oecd-science-technology-and-innovation-outlook-2025_bae3698d.html
11. O’Leary, J., & Tross, R. (2017, October 10). The art of points-based procurement for agile projects. Deloitte Insights. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/government-public-sector-services/agile-in-government-points-based-procurement.html
12. Times of Central Asia. (2025, November 12). Kazakhstan to establish Ministry for AI development and digital code. https://timesca.com/kazakhstan-to-establish-ministry-for-ai-development-digital-code-and-crypto-asset-fund/
13. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). (2024). E-Government Survey 2024. United Nations. https://desapublications.un.org/publications/e-government-survey-2024
14. Vavreniuk, S. A., Nepomnyashchyy, O. M., Marusheva, O. A., Lahunova, I. A., & Shostak, S. M. (2021). Mechanisms of public administration in post-Soviet societies. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS2.1358
15. Williams, C. C., & Dzhekova, R. (2014). Evaluating the cross-national transferability of policies: A conceptual framework. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 19(4), 1–18.
16. World Bank. (2020). A practitioner’s guide to innovation policy instruments. World Bank Group. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/158861581492462334
17. Yessengeldina, A., Kylbayev, Y., & Baibussinova, Z. (2025). Assessment of the maturity of project management offices of government agencies of Kazakhstan: Analysis, trends, and development prospects. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 19, Article 0006. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2025-0006
18. Young, R., Young, M., & Romero Zapata, J. (2014). Project, programme and portfolio maturity: A case study of the Australian Federal Government. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-04-2013-0011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurkhat Ibadildin, Айгуль Айтбаева , Сымбат Исабаева, Mustafa Colak

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

